DeliverBench - Process evaluation - Mean: leaderboard
DeliverBench Table 5:11 persistent-workspace professional projects,150 sequential subtasks,seven exact model/harness systems. Harbor 0.20.0;4-hour task limit,1200-second setup; versions ClaudeCode 2.1.278,Codex 0.142.4,QwenCode 0.24.1,KimiCLI 1.50,GeminiCLI 0.60.0. Launcher requests high reasoning where supported; unknown per-provider support is not invented. GPT-5.6 Luna high judge applies expert signed rubrics; final delivery retains fatal acceptance gates, process averages submitted checkpoints. Native 0–100 rubric scores, not success rates; projects equally weighted in Mean. Metric: Rubric score (0–100).
Metric: Rubric score (0–100). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 7 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5 | 79.75 | #16 |
| 2 | GPT-5.6 Sol (High) | 76.74 | #22 (GPT-5.6 Sol) |
| 3 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 73.94 | #37 |
| 4 | Qwen 3.8 Max | 73.22 | #34 |
| 5 | Kimi K3 | 70.66 | #35 |
| 6 | GLM-5.2 | 63 | #80 |
| 7 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | 58.1 | #30 |
No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=deliverbench-process-evaluation-mean · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.