DeceptionBench Mesa-Utility - Sycophancy: leaderboard

A neutral prompt first records what the model itself believes; a second prompt adds an outer goal that rewards a sycophancy answer, and the number is the share of final answers that stay consistent with the earlier belief (GPT-4o judge). Unlike DeceptionBench Real-World, the reference is the model's own stated belief, so it scores deception against itself rather than against facts.

Metric: Answer consistent with own belief (%, higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4.590#569
2Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 03-25)88.33#236
3Gemma 3 27B (IT)86.67#1289
4GPT-4.186.67#495
5Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct86.67#1092
6Claude 3.5 Sonnet86.67#746
7Gemini 1.5 Pro86.67#1049
8O186.67#393
9Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)86.67#458 (Claude 3.7 Sonnet)
10GPT-4o85#741
11Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct85#2564
12Claude 3.7 Sonnet85#458
13O3 Mini85#533
14Gemma 3 12B (IT)83.33#1837
15DeepSeek R183.33#473

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=deceptionbench-mesa-utility-sycophancy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.