DeceptionBench Mesa-Utility - Strategic Deception: leaderboard

A neutral prompt first records what the model itself believes; a second prompt adds an outer goal that rewards a strategic deception answer, and the number is the share of final answers that stay consistent with the earlier belief (GPT-4o judge). Unlike DeceptionBench Real-World, the reference is the model's own stated belief, so it scores deception against itself rather than against facts.

Metric: Answer consistent with own belief (%, higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct75#1092
2Claude 3 Opus70#1455
3Gemini 1.5 Pro69.49#1049
4GPT-4o68.33#741
5GPT-4.166.67#495
6DeepSeek R165#473
7Claude 3.5 Sonnet65#746
8O164.41#393
9Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 03-25)63.33#236
10Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)63.33#458 (Claude 3.7 Sonnet)
11Claude 3.7 Sonnet61.02#458
12GPT-4.560#569
13O3 Mini60#533
14DeepSeek V358.33#716
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct57.14#4246

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=deceptionbench-mesa-utility-strategic-deception · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.