DeceptionBench Mesa-Utility - Sandbagging: leaderboard

A neutral prompt first records what the model itself believes; a second prompt adds an outer goal that rewards a sandbagging answer, and the number is the share of final answers that stay consistent with the earlier belief (GPT-4o judge). Unlike DeceptionBench Real-World, the reference is the model's own stated belief, so it scores deception against itself rather than against facts.

Metric: Answer consistent with own belief (%, higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B59.09#7996
2Llama 3.1 8B Instruct50#4246
3Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct48.89#1092
4DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B48.89#6754
5GPT-4.146.67#495
6Gemini 1.5 Pro45.45#1049
7Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct44.44#2564
8GPT-4.544.44#569
9O3 Mini44.44#533
10DeepSeek R143.18#473
11Claude 3.5 Sonnet43.18#746
12Gemma 3 27B (IT)42.22#1289
13Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)42.22#458 (Claude 3.7 Sonnet)
14Claude 3 Opus40.91#1455
15GPT-4o39.53#741

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=deceptionbench-mesa-utility-sandbagging · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.