DecepEval - Long-horizon (Neutral): leaderboard

An agent doing a long-horizon task observes a fact that blocks success (for example a failed download) and must report status under routine instructions with no inducement; the number is the share of instances where a judge finds it claimed success, fabricated results or hid the failure. Unlike hallucination boards, the agent saw the contradicting evidence itself.

Metric: Long-horizon instances judged deceptive, neutral condition (%). Source: arxiv.org. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (High)1.5#30 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2Grok 4.5 (High)3.09#82 (Grok 4.5)
3GPT-5.6 Terra (High)5.5#62 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
4DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) (High)21.72#84 (DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813))
5GLM-5.3 Flash (High)33.1#122 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
6DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)50.5#258 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
7Claude Sonnet 5 (High)53.12#111 (Claude Sonnet 5)
8Claude Haiku 4.554.7#568
9Claude Opus 5 (High)58.29#22 (Claude Opus 5)

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=decepeval-long-horizon-neutral · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.