CursorBench 4.0: leaderboard

Cursor coding-agent benchmark for ambiguous, multi-file real-world tasks; the 4.0 task set adds long-horizon editing, refactoring, investigation, intent understanding, job management, and design adherence.

Metric: Score (%). Source: cursor.com. Source: cursor.com. Source: epoch.ai. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 81 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)57.8#3 (Claude Opus 5.5)
2Claude Opus 5.5 (High)56#3 (Claude Opus 5.5)
3Claude Opus 5.5 (xHigh)56#3 (Claude Opus 5.5)
4Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max)55.5#14 (Claude Sonnet 5.5)
5Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)53.1#14 (Claude Sonnet 5.5)
6Gemini 4 Argon (High)52.9#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
7Gemini 4 Argon (Medium)52.8#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
8Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium)52.5#3 (Claude Opus 5.5)
9Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)51.8#10 (Claude Fable 5.1)
10Claude Fable 5.1 (xHigh)51.6#10 (Claude Fable 5.1)
11Gemini 4 Argon (Low)50.6#9 (Gemini 4 Argon)
12Muse Wonder (Max)50.4#18 (Muse Wonder)
13Claude Fable 5.1 (High)49.2#10 (Claude Fable 5.1)
14Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)48.4#43 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
15Muse Wonder (xHigh)48.2#18 (Muse Wonder)

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cursorbench-4-0 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.