CureMed-Bench: leaderboard

Open-ended multilingual medical reasoning from CureMed-Bench (Onyame et al., 2026), built from MedlinePlus content and reviewed by medical experts and native speakers in 13 languages, including Amharic, Hausa, Swahili and Yoruba. Logical accuracy in percent: the share of final answers a GPT-4o judge matches to the reference answer, pooled over 1,431 held-out questions, zero-shot; higher is better.

Metric: Logical accuracy (%; share of final answers a GPT-4o judge matches to the reference answer, pooled over 1,431 held-out open-ended medical questions in 13 languages; zero-shot). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 49 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 Mini80.57#349
2Claude 3 Haiku73.31#2629
3GPT-5 Nano73.24#888
4Llama 3.3 70B Instruct60.8#1353
5Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct58.8#1093
6Gemini 2.5 Flash54.79#452
7Llama 3.1 70B54.65#1493
8Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct49.69#1216
9Qwen 3 32B48.57#960
10Ministral 8B42.87#4511
11Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct41.79#1745
12DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B40.27#1780
13Qwen 3 14B38.62#1235
14Gemma 2 9B36.97#2881
15Llama 3 8B UltraMedical35.29#6117

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=curemed-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.