CURE (Clinical Diagnosis, History, Images and Findings) - Multiple Choice: leaderboard

Metric: Differential-diagnosis accuracy in percent choosing the diagnosis among 4 to 5 candidates (terminology standardized and distractors generated where needed by GPT-5.2, physician-checked on 50 cases), on CURE's 500 test cases (Eurorad 2025 radiology cases: clinical history, a mean of 8 images, radiologist findings with diagnostic statements removed), zero-shot, given the clinical history, images and the radiologist's written findings; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)91.8#64
2GPT-5.291#105
3Kimi K2.590.8#139
4Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct87.6#264
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)85.6#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
6GLM-4.6V84.4#309
7Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)83.8#287 (Qwen 3 VL 32B)
8Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)83.2#338 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
9Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct83#276
10Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct82.4#365
11Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct81#401
12Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)79.6
13Gemma 3 12B (IT)77#655
14MedGemma-4B-IT73.8#842
15Gemma 3 4B (IT)66.2#971

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cure-clinical-diagnosis-history-images-and-findings-multiple-choice · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.