CURE (Clinical Diagnosis, History and Findings) - Multiple Choice: leaderboard

Metric: Differential-diagnosis accuracy in percent choosing the diagnosis among 4 to 5 candidates (terminology standardized and distractors generated where needed by GPT-5.2, physician-checked on 50 cases), on CURE's 500 test cases (Eurorad 2025 radiology cases: clinical history, a mean of 8 images, radiologist findings with diagnostic statements removed), zero-shot, given the clinical history and the radiologist's written findings; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)94.2#64
2Kimi K2.590.2#139
3GPT-5.290#105
4Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)86.4#228 (Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B)
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct85.2#264
6Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)84.2#338 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
7GLM-4.6V84#309
8Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)83.4#287 (Qwen 3 VL 32B)
9Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct83#365
10Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct82.6#276
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)80.8
12Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct80#401
13Gemma 3 12B (IT)77.6#655
14MedGemma-4B-IT72#842
15Gemma 3 4B (IT)66.2#971

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cure-clinical-diagnosis-history-and-findings-multiple-choice · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.