CSR-Bench (Hallucination) - Modality Conflict: leaderboard

Metric: Alignment accuracy (%) on a structurally similar question whose answer cannot be verified from the image (the model should say it cannot be determined); CSR-Bench's hallucination subset: 1,411 images, each asked an original image-grounded question and three misleading variants, scored by a GPT-5-nano judge (1 when the response gives the image-grounded target or rejects the miscategorized request), temperature 0, 8,192-token cap; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2028. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro38.9#77
2Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct27#401
3InternVL3-14B24.5#494
4Gemini 2.5 Flash22.1#237
5Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct20.8#643
6InternVL3-8B20.4#606
7Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct20.1#506
8Seed-1.618.2#257
9Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)13#471 (Qwen 3 VL 4B)
10Llama 3.2 11B Instruct12.6#1112
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)12
12Gemma 3 12B (IT)11.4#655
13Gemma 3 4B (IT)4.9#971

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=csr-bench-hallucination-modality-conflict · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.