CrueltyBench: leaderboard

CrueltyBench (CaML): single-turn, realistic in-persona requests with implicit animal-cruelty implications that never mention the animal's welfare (18 harm scenarios plus controls, 5 epochs). A fixed two-judge panel (Claude Opus 5, Gemini 3.7 Flash) grades each response green (clearly reduces or mitigates the cruelty), yellow or red; control items penalise moralising at ordinary requests. Score: mean welfare score (0-100; green 1, yellow 0.5, red 0). Higher is better. Source: https://compassionbench.com/crueltybench

Metric: Welfare score (0-100; two-judge panel, green 1 / yellow 0.5 / red 0, mean over the implicit animal-cruelty requests and epochs). Source: compassionbench.com. Saturation forecast: Around September 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6 Astra81.7#6
2GPT-5.6 Sol72.8#20
3GPT-5.563.6#31
4Claude Opus 556.7#12
5Muse Spark 1.351.7#25
6Claude Opus 5.549.7#3
7Qwen 3.8 Max49.4#32
8Grok 4.649.2#26
9Claude Fable 5.139.7#9
10Claude Sonnet 5.537.5#11
11Gemini 3.8 Flash35#22
12Kimi K332.5#30
13Claude Sonnet 526.4#56
14DeepSeek V4 Pro23.9#100

No result here: #7 GPT-6.1 Sol, #8 Gemini 4 Argon, #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=crueltybench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-19.