CooperBench: leaderboard

Collaborative coding tasks from 12 open-source repositories in Python, TypeScript, Go and Rust: two agents run by the same model each implement one feature of a task pair in separate OpenHands containers and can message each other, and a task counts only if their merged patches pass both features' tests. CooperBench (Khatua et al., Stanford, 2026); percent of 652 tasks solved after the naive, union and learned-resolver merge stages, higher is better.

Metric: Cooperative task success (%; two agents that can message each other each implement one feature of a task pair in isolated workspaces, and the merged patch must pass both features' tests after the naive, union and learned-resolver merge stages; 652 tasks). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 5 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-527.9#163
2Claude Sonnet 4.525.92#244
3MiniMax-M213.96#669
4Qwen 3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct13.34#973
5Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct4.6#1078

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cooperbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.