ContractScrub: leaderboard

Macro F1 for identifying drafting errors and defined-term issues across nine categories in 44 legal contracts. Published reasoning settings and disabled-reasoning comparisons are preserved separately.

Metric: Macro F1 (0-1). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)0.66#58 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)0.64#90 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
3GPT-5.5 (Medium)0.63#31 (GPT-5.5)
4Claude Opus 4.7 (High)0.62#49 (Claude Opus 4.7)
5Gemini 2.5 Pro (Thinking)0.56#152 (Gemini 2.5 Pro)
6GPT-5.2 (Medium)0.55#110 (GPT-5.2)
7GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)0.53#31 (GPT-5.5)
8Claude Haiku 4.5 (High)0.49#280 (Claude Haiku 4.5)
9Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning)0.49#49 (Claude Opus 4.7)
10O4 Mini0.45#180
11Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)0.33#358 (Gemma 4 26B A4B)
12Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Thinking)0.32#146 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=contractscrub · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.