CompanionBench - English - Calibrated Challenge: leaderboard

CompanionBench capability score for Calibrated Challenge: validate-then-challenge, invitational framing, using the user's own words and anti-sycophancy, averaged over English-condition companionship dialogues by a cross-family LLM judge panel (CompanionBench, arXiv 2608.02046v2, Appendix Table H.1). Mean rubric score on a 1-10 scale; higher is better. Capability means correlate strongly across capabilities.

Metric: Mean judge score (1-10). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4 Pro7.96#112
2Claude Opus 4.87.94#39
3GPT-5.57.93#33
4Claude Sonnet 4.67.82#94
5GLM-5.27.79#80
6GPT-5.47.78#83
7Qwen 3.5 397B A17B7.72#154
8Kimi K2.57.71#152
9GPT-5.17.7#145
10Qwen 3.7 Max7.7#85
11DeepSeek V4 Flash7.69#155
12Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct7.69#315
13GLM-57.68#149
14GLM-5.17.67#109
15Kimi K2.67.59#113

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=companionbench-english-calibrated-challenge · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.