ComboShoppingBench - Semantic Requirements: leaderboard

ComboShoppingBench (arXiv 2608.09282v1, Table 2): 22 tool-using agent configurations, 11 models each with thinking enabled and disabled, on 291 compositional shopping tasks over a frozen catalog with coupons and budgets. Share of tasks whose basket meets every task-specific semantic criterion, judged by Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview, which is also an evaluated agent; percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%; LLM-judged). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.583.8#33
2Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)77.7#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
3Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)76.6#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
4Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)72.5#113 (Kimi K2.6)
5MiniMax-M3 (Thinking)71.8#151 (MiniMax-M3)
6Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)71.1#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
7Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)70.1#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
8Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)69.8#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
9DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)67.4#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
10GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)64.9#33 (GPT-5.5)
11GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)64.3#80 (GLM-5.2)
12Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning)63.6#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
13Claude Opus 4.8 (Non-reasoning)63.6#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
14Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)62.5#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
15Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)60.5#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=comboshoppingbench-semantic-requirements · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.