ComboShoppingBench - Overall Success: leaderboard

ComboShoppingBench (arXiv 2608.09282v1, Table 2): 22 tool-using agent configurations, 11 models each with thinking enabled and disabled, on 291 compositional shopping tasks over a frozen catalog with coupons and budgets. Share of tasks passing every LLM-judged and rule-based check; percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%; all judged and rule-based checks). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.561.2#33
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)50.2#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
3Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)49.8#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
4Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)49.5#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
5Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)44#113 (Kimi K2.6)
6GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)30.2#80 (GLM-5.2)
7Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)27.8#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
8MiniMax-M3 (Thinking)25.4#151 (MiniMax-M3)
9Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning)23.4#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
10Claude Opus 4.8 (Non-reasoning)21.3#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
11GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)14.4#33 (GPT-5.5)
12Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)14.1#113 (Kimi K2.6)
13Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)12.4#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
14Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)11.3#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
15Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)5.2#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=comboshoppingbench-overall-success · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.