ComboShoppingBench - Coupon Optimality: leaderboard

ComboShoppingBench (arXiv 2608.09282v1, Table 2): 22 tool-using agent configurations, 11 models each with thinking enabled and disabled, on 291 compositional shopping tasks over a frozen catalog with coupons and budgets. Share of tasks whose coupon set yields the lowest payable amount for the chosen basket; percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.594.2#33
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)93.8#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
3Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)93.1#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
4Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)91.8#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
5Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)91.1#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
6Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)83.8#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
7Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning)80.8#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
8Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)77#113 (Kimi K2.6)
9Claude Opus 4.8 (Non-reasoning)76.6#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
10GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)68.4#80 (GLM-5.2)
11MiniMax-M3 (Thinking)67.4#151 (MiniMax-M3)
12Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)64.3#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
13DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)61.9#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
14Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)43.6#113 (Kimi K2.6)
15GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)39.2#33 (GPT-5.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=comboshoppingbench-coupon-optimality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.