ComboShoppingBench - Coupon Legality: leaderboard

ComboShoppingBench (arXiv 2608.09282v1, Table 2): 22 tool-using agent configurations, 11 models each with thinking enabled and disabled, on 291 compositional shopping tasks over a frozen catalog with coupons and budgets. Share of tasks whose selected coupons satisfy their scope, threshold and mutual-exclusion rules; percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)99.7#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)98.6#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
3Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)98.6#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
4Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)98.3#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
5GPT-5.596.6#33
6Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning)96.6#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
7Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)96.2#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
8Claude Opus 4.8 (Non-reasoning)95.9#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
9Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)95.2#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
10Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)93.8#113 (Kimi K2.6)
11GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)93.5#80 (GLM-5.2)
12DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)88.7#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
13GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)88.3#33 (GPT-5.5)
14Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)87.3#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
15MiniMax-M3 (Thinking)80.8#151 (MiniMax-M3)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=comboshoppingbench-coupon-legality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.