ComboShoppingBench - Coupon-ID Validity: leaderboard

ComboShoppingBench (arXiv 2608.09282v1, Table 2): 22 tool-using agent configurations, 11 models each with thinking enabled and disabled, on 291 compositional shopping tasks over a frozen catalog with coupons and budgets. Share of tasks whose cited coupon identifiers all exist in the task's coupon pack; percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)100#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
2Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)100#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
3Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)99.7#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)99.7#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
5Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)99.7#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
6GPT-5.599.3#33
7Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning)99.3#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
8Claude Opus 4.8 (Non-reasoning)98.6#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
9Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)98.3#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
10GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)97.3#80 (GLM-5.2)
11Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)96.9#113 (Kimi K2.6)
12Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)95.9#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
13GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)94.8#33 (GPT-5.5)
14DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)93.1#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
15MiniMax-M3 (Thinking)88#151 (MiniMax-M3)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=comboshoppingbench-coupon-id-validity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.