ComboShoppingBench - Budget Compliance: leaderboard

ComboShoppingBench (arXiv 2608.09282v1, Table 2): 22 tool-using agent configurations, 11 models each with thinking enabled and disabled, on 291 compositional shopping tasks over a frozen catalog with coupons and budgets. Share of tasks whose final payable amount meets the request's budget mode (cap, approximate target or range); percent, higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)87.3#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2GPT-5.586.3#33
3Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)82.5#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
4Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)80.8#113 (Kimi K2.6)
5Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)80.4#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
6Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)80.1#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
7GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)78.4#80 (GLM-5.2)
8Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning)78#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
9Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)74.9#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
10Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)74.6#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
11Claude Opus 4.8 (Non-reasoning)73.5#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
12DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)72.5#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
13MiniMax-M3 (Thinking)66.3#151 (MiniMax-M3)
14Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)65.6#113 (Kimi K2.6)
15Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)63.2#182 (Qwen 3.6 27B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=comboshoppingbench-budget-compliance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.