ClockBench: leaderboard

Visual reasoning benchmark testing if AI can read analog clocks. 180 clocks, 720 questions covering time reading, arithmetic, rotation, and timezone conversion. Human baseline: 90.7%.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: clockbench.ai. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 41 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Median Human90.7
2Gemini 4 Argon (High)83.3#8 (Gemini 4 Argon)
3Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)77.2#3 (Claude Opus 5.5)
4GPT-6 Astra (Max)75#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
5GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)74.4#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
6GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)68.3#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
7Gemini 3.8 Flash66.7#21
8Claude Opus 5 (Max)65.5#12 (Claude Opus 5)
9Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)59.4#9 (Claude Fable 5.1)
10Gemini 3.7 Flash53.3#23
11GPT-5.4 (High)50.6#79 (GPT-5.4)
12GPT-5.5 (High)46.1#31 (GPT-5.5)
13Muse Spark 1.342.2#24
14Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct39.4#273
15Claude Fable 537.2#16

No result here: #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clockbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.