CLIR-Bench: leaderboard

CLIR-Bench (2026) tests question answering over sparse, irregularly sampled ICU time series from MIMIC-IV: 4-option multiple-choice questions over 11 tasks in understanding, reasoning, forecasting and decision-making, with the full serialized series as input. The board is macro-average accuracy in percent over the 11 tasks; chance is 25 and higher is better.

Metric: Macro-average accuracy (%) over the 11 tasks, 4-option multiple-choice questions over serialized irregular ICU time series (Full-TS input), chance 25; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 Mini50.15#389
2Kimi K2.649.09#178
3Gemini 2.5 Flash40.3#453
4DeepSeek V4 Flash35.91#258
5Gemma 3 27B (IT)30.87#1289
6Gemma 4 12B (IT)29.82#693
7Qwen 3.5 9B26.64#803
8Qwen 3.5 4B25.73#1175
9Qwen 3.6 27B25.01#341

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clir-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.