ClinSQL - Laboratory Results Analysis: leaderboard

ClinSQL's Execution Score (a GPT-5 judge checks the executed result table against an expert rubric tree; percent, higher is better) restricted to the test tasks of its laboratory results scenario: trends in lab values, unit conversions and relating results to clinical conditions. Queries come from chain-of-thought prompting with up to two execution-error refinements; Yale University and University of Washington, 2026.

Metric: Execution Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek R1 052866.91#425
2GPT-5 Mini (2025-08-07)65.09#341
3Gemini 2.5 Pro63.66#262
4Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct55.94#619
5Gemini 2.5 Flash54.4#452
6DeepSeek V3.153.66#500
7Qwen 3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct49.78#641
8GPT-5 Nano49.02#888
9O4 Mini (2025-04-16)48.45#362
10GPT-4.148.39#492
11Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)45.5#438 (Grok 4 Fast)
12Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct42.33#763
13Llama 4 Maverick Instruct37.66#1125
14Mistral Medium 332.22#1079
15Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 FP8 (Thinking)28.94#431

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clinsql-laboratory-results-analysis · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.