CLEM MatchIt ASCII: leaderboard

CLEM text release v3.0: models compare ASCII depictions through conversation. Scores combine protocol-valid play and conditional task quality, higher is better. Headline preserves the native published product of macro-average played percentage and macro-average conditional quality; per-game scores multiply source-published played and quality components without extra rounding. Source temperature, player configuration and exact evidenced model/checkpoint settings are retained. Undefined conditional quality remains missing rather than imputed zero.

Metric: Game Clemscore (%), text v3.0; published played × quality / 100. Source: huggingface.co. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 30 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (Medium)100#110 (GPT-5.2)
2GPT-5.2 (High)95#110 (GPT-5.2)
3Mistral Large 392.5#401
4aya-expanse-32B92.5#692
5DeepSeek V3.290#205
6Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct87.5#454
7Qwen 3 Max85#208
8DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)85#205 (DeepSeek V3.2)
9GLM-4.785#192
10Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)80#144 (Kimi K2.5)
11Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)80#82
12Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct80#368
13EuroLLM-22B-Instruct-251280#701
14MiniMax-M2.577.5#303
15Llama 3.1 8B Instruct72.5#1035

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clem-matchit-ascii · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.