CLEM Deal or No Deal: leaderboard

CLEM text release v3.0: models negotiate allocations of goods through conversation. Scores combine protocol-valid play and conditional task quality, higher is better. Headline preserves the native published product of macro-average played percentage and macro-average conditional quality; per-game scores multiply source-published played and quality components without extra rounding. Source temperature, player configuration and exact evidenced model/checkpoint settings are retained. Undefined conditional quality remains missing rather than imputed zero.

Metric: Game Clemscore (%), text v3.0; published played × quality / 100. Source: huggingface.co. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (High)99.12#110 (GPT-5.2)
2GLM-4.787.75#192
3GPT-5.2 (Medium)87.34#110 (GPT-5.2)
4Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)82.68#82
5Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)78.59#144 (Kimi K2.5)
6GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)72.53#141 (GLM-5)
7Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct70.37#454
8GLM-4.667.36#252
9Kimi K2 (Thinking)62.85#243 (Kimi K2)
10DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)56.2#205 (DeepSeek V3.2)
11MiniMax-M2.555.24#303
12DeepSeek V3.253.4#205
13Qwen 3 Max52.81#208
14GPT-OSS-120B45.05#341
15Llama 3.3 70B Instruct42.9#534

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clem-deal-or-no-deal · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.