CLEM Clean Up: leaderboard

CLEM text release v3.0: models coordinate a cleanup task under conversational interaction rules. Scores combine protocol-valid play and conditional task quality, higher is better. Headline preserves the native published product of macro-average played percentage and macro-average conditional quality; per-game scores multiply source-published played and quality components without extra rounding. Source temperature, player configuration and exact evidenced model/checkpoint settings are retained. Undefined conditional quality remains missing rather than imputed zero.

Metric: Game Clemscore (%), text v3.0; published played × quality / 100. Source: huggingface.co. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 27 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (High)100#110 (GPT-5.2)
2GPT-5.2 (Medium)99.94#110 (GPT-5.2)
3Kimi K2 (Thinking)98.04#243 (Kimi K2)
4Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)97.25#82
5GLM-4.787.06#192
6GLM-4.683.29#252
7MiniMax-M2.574.22#303
8Qwen 3 Max72.04#208
9DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)70.55#205 (DeepSeek V3.2)
10GLM-5 (Non-reasoning)70.41#141 (GLM-5)
11DeepSeek V3.268.43#205
12Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)61.59#144 (Kimi K2.5)
13Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct41.09#454
14Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct40.38#368
15Llama 3.1 70B Instruct38.05#561

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clem-clean-up · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.