CLBench Life: leaderboard

CL-bench Life overall solving rate: context-learning tasks built on everyday, real-life contexts (conversations, fragmented notes, activity records) that the model has to learn from. Percent (published as a 0-1 fraction), higher is better; labels keep reasoning effort such as High, Low or NoThink.

Metric: Solving Rate (%). Source: www.clbench.com. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (High)22.2#33 (GPT-5.5)
2GPT-5.4 (xHigh)21.7#83 (GPT-5.4)
3GPT-5.4 (High)19.3#83 (GPT-5.4)
4GPT-5.1 (High)17.3#145 (GPT-5.1)
5Claude Opus 4.6 (High)17#67 (Claude Opus 4.6)
6Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)16.9#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)16#64
8Hy3-preview (High)15.7#166 (Hy3-preview)
9Seed 2.0 Pro (High)15.5#122 (Seed 2.0 Pro)
10GPT-5.413.8#83
11Claude Opus 4.613.6#67
12DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)13.5#112 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
13Kimi K2.5 (High)13.2#152 (Kimi K2.5)
14Grok 4.20 (High)11.9#179 (Grok 4.20)
15Seed 2.0 Pro (Medium)11.4#122 (Seed 2.0 Pro)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clbench-life · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.