ClawArena-Team - Workspace-Permission Precision: leaderboard

ClawArena-Team (2026) measures how well one language model manages a team of subagents: over 41 multi-turn multimodal scenarios, a text-only main agent must create, empower and schedule a fixed local pool of text, vision and audio subagents, with execution-based checks and no LLM judge. The board is workspace-permission precision, the files each subagent accesses divided by the files it was granted, in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Workspace-permission precision (%): per subagent, files accessed divided by files granted, averaged; 41 multi-turn multimodal scenarios with 258 evaluation rounds; a text-only main agent with partial workspace access creates, empowers and schedules a fixed locally served pool of LLM, VLM and omni subagents; execution-based checks, no LLM judge; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Fable 549.2#27
2GPT-5.547.5#49
3DeepSeek V4 Pro46.3#188
4Gemini 3.5 Flash45.7#101
5GLM-5.244.4#138
6Claude Sonnet 4.643.2#161
7Kimi K2.641.9#178
8GPT-5.440.8#123
9Qwen 3.6 27B40.7#341
10Gemma 4 31B37.9#394
11Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)36.6#94
12GLM-4.7 Flash11.7#1259

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=clawarena-team-workspace-permission-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.