ChronoPhyBench - Next-State Selection (3 Options): leaderboard

ChronoPhyBench (2026) tests whether multimodal models predict what happens next in real physical-interaction videos rather than relying on language priors. On this board the model sees eight frames of a video with its caption and chooses the next frame from three candidates; the score is accuracy (chance 33.3 percent). Higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%) on ChronoPhyBench next-state frame selection with 3 candidates: given a real physical-interaction video context (8 uniformly sampled frames) and its caption, choose the frame that comes next; closed models at temperature 0.1, open models at their recommended sampling; chance 33.3; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.572.5#49
2Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)68.5#113
3Doubao-Seed-2.0-Pro-26021568#152
4Doubao-Seed-1-8-25122855#282
5GPT-5.452.5#123
6GLM-4.1V-9B (Thinking)52.5#1060 (GLM-4.1V-9B)
7GPT-5.345.5#197
8Doubao-Seed-1.6-thinking-25071541.5#324
9InternVL3-38B41#903
10InternVL3-14B40.5#1182
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)40#887
12Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct38.5#981
13InternVL3-8B37.5#1688
14Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct37#585

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chronophybench-next-state-selection-3-options · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.