CharXiv-D: leaderboard

Descriptive split of CharXiv (Princeton, 2024): 4 short-answer questions per chart on titles, axis labels, legends and tick values over 2,323 arXiv charts; GPT-4o 84.45%, humans 92.1%.

Metric: Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 92 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O3 (High)95#124 (O3)
2O4 Mini (High)94.3#180 (O4 Mini)
3GPT-4.590#274
4O1 (High)88.9#183 (O1)
5GPT-4.1 Mini88.4#355
6GPT-4.187.9#248
7O187.45#183
8InternVL3-38B87.2#405
9InternVL3-78B85.1#352
10Claude 3.5 Sonnet84.3#350
11Doubao-1.5-Pro84.3#287
12InternVL3-14B82.2#505
13Qwen 2 VL 72B81.35#460
14GPT-4o Mini74.92#599
15GPT-4.1 Nano73.9#731

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=charxiv-d · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.