ChartMuseum: leaderboard

Chart-understanding benchmark reported in Anthropic system cards, with no-tools and Python-tools variants.

Metric: Overall Accuracy (%). Source: anthropic.com. Source: chartmuseum-leaderboard.github.io. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)80.7#58
2Gemini 3 Flash78.6#99
3GPT-5.2 (High)77#110 (GPT-5.2)
4Gemma 4 31B (IT)71.1#176
5Gemma 4 26B A4B (IT)70.6#297
6GPT-5 Mini (High)63.3#186 (GPT-5 Mini)
7Gemini 2.5 Pro63#152
8GPT-5 (High)62.9#98 (GPT-5)
9O4 Mini (High)61.5#180 (O4 Mini)
10O3 (High)60.9#124 (O3)
11Claude Opus 4.5 (High)60.7#83 (Claude Opus 4.5)
12Claude Opus 4.159.1#140
13Claude Sonnet 452.6#199
14Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)49.7#351 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B)
15Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)44.4

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartmuseum · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.