ChartArena - Radar Chart (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese radar charts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese radar charts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 43 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)62.7#94
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)59.7#256 (Kimi K2.5)
3Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)57.8#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
4Gemma 4 31B (IT)55.5#342
5Gemini 2.5 Pro53#266
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct52.4#522
7Qwen 3.5 9B44.8#803
8GLM-4.5V43.1#744
9Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct42.6#981
10GPT-541.5#167
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)39.3#887
12Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct39.2#1053
13Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct38.5#846
14Qwen 3.5 4B38#1175
15Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)35.5#1296

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-radar-chart-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.