ChartArena - Pie Chart (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese pie charts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese pie charts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 43 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)95.1#94
2Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)88.4#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
3Gemini 2.5 Pro87.3#266
4Gemma 4 31B (IT)87.2#342
5Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)86.7#256 (Kimi K2.5)
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct85.5#522
7Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct85.5#1279
8Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct84.7#981
9Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct84.7#1053
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)84.2#887
11GLM-4.5V83.1#744
12Qwen 3.5 4B79.6#1175
13GPT-578.9#167
14Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct77#846
15Qwen 3.5 9B76.9#803

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-pie-chart-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.