ChartArena - Mind Map (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese mind maps, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese mind maps, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 38 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)85.2#94
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)79.4#256 (Kimi K2.5)
3Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)70.9#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
4Gemini 2.5 Pro67.1#266
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct65.2#522
6Gemma 4 31B (IT)61#342
7Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct55#846
8Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct54.6#981
9Qwen 3.5 9B54.5#803
10GLM-4.5V43.7#744
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)42.3#887
12Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct40.6#1053
13Qwen 3.5 4B39.6#1175
14Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct38.1#1279
15Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)35.7#1296

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-mind-map-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.