ChartArena - Line Chart (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese line charts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese line charts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 43 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)85.3#94
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)79.8#256 (Kimi K2.5)
3Gemini 2.5 Pro77.6#266
4Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)77.6#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
5Gemma 4 31B (IT)76.4#342
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct73.8#522
7GLM-4.5V70.5#744
8Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct66.7#846
9GPT-565.1#167
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)64.9#887
11Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct61.1#981
12Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)57.9#1296
13Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct57#1279
14Qwen 3.5 9B54.1#803
15Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct53.4#1053

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-line-chart-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.