ChartArena - Flowchart (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese flowcharts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese flowcharts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 38 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)63.1#94
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)57.9#256 (Kimi K2.5)
3Gemini 2.5 Pro57.8#266
4Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)56.5#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct49.8#522
6Gemma 4 31B (IT)44#342
7Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct43.6#846
8Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct41.5#981
9Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct40.1#1053
10GLM-4.5V39.6#744
11Qwen 3.5 9B38.1#803
12Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)38.1#887
13Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct35.9#1279
14GPT-535.3#167
15Qwen 3.5 4B30.3#1175

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-flowchart-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.