ChartArena - Combination Chart (English): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on English combination charts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on English combination charts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 44 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)39.7#94
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)33.6#256 (Kimi K2.5)
3Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)31.5#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
4Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct29.1#522
5Gemini 2.5 Pro28.7#266
6Gemma 4 31B (IT)22.7#342
7GLM-4.5V21.2#744
8Qwen 3.5 9B16.8#803
9Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)16#887
10Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct14.3#846
11GPT-514.2#167
12Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct13.2#981
13Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)11.3#1296
14Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct10.6#1053
15GPT-4o9.9#741

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-combination-chart-english · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.