ChartArena - Combination Chart (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese combination charts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese combination charts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 43 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)70.3#94
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)63.6#256 (Kimi K2.5)
3Gemma 4 31B (IT)59.3#342
4Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct58.2#522
5Gemini 2.5 Pro57.6#266
6Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)56.9#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
7GLM-4.5V52.5#744
8Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct50.5#846
9Qwen 3.5 9B49.5#803
10Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct47.9#981
11Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct47.3#1053
12Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct47.1#1279
13Qwen 3.5 4B46.7#1175
14GPT-546.5#167
15Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)46.2#887

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-combination-chart-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.