ChartArena - Bar Chart (Chinese): leaderboard

ChartArena (2026) tests chart parsing: a model converts a chart image into structured data, scored format-agnostically as triples for numeric charts or as labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps. This board is mAP at the high tolerance level in percent on Chinese bar charts, averaged over digital, printed-photo and hand-drawn styles; higher is better.

Metric: mAP-high (%) on Chinese bar charts, each model parses the chart image into its native structured format, normalized format-agnostically to (header, entity, value) triples for numeric charts or to labeled graphs and trees for flowcharts and mind maps; mean average precision over similarity thresholds at the high tolerance level, averaged over three visual styles (digital renderings, printed photos, hand-drawn photos); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 43 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)78.7#94
2Gemini 2.5 Pro76.5#266
3Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)70.3#256 (Kimi K2.5)
4Gemma 4 31B (IT)68.7#342
5Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct67.9#522
6Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)65.3#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
7GLM-4.5V61.4#744
8Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct60.1#1053
9Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct58.6#981
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)56.5#887
11Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct53.3#846
12Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct52.7#1279
13GPT-552.3#167
14Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)49.8#1296
15Qwen 3.5 9B45.1#803

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartarena-bar-chart-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.