ChartAct - Box Charts: leaderboard

Metric: Success rate (%) on box chart questions, pooling both environments; the model acts in an OSWorld-style desktop on screenshots only (pyautogui actions, at most 15 steps, temperature 0.3) to hover, click, zoom or drag 673 real interactive web charts and answers 1,440 human-reviewed questions, an LLM judge with majority voting deciding correctness; Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro are scored on a representative 300-case subset per environment; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Claude Opus 4.786.2
2Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)72.8
3GPT-5.567.2
4Doubao-Seed-2-0-Pro-260215 (High)53.3
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Low)46.6
6Qwen 3.6 Plus (Thinking)45.7
7Qwen 3.5 122B A10B45.3
8Qwen 3.5 35B A3B34.1
9GLM-4.6V33.3
10Gemma 4 31B (IT)26.1

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=chartact-box-charts · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.