CESBench - Countermeasures: leaderboard

The countermeasures sub-domain of CESBench (Zhou et al., 2026): 62 items on fault-injection countermeasures, hiding, masking and threshold implementations, across multiple-choice, judgment, scenario and code tasks. Score in percent, the mean of the four task-type scores within the sub-domain; higher is better.

Metric: Composite score (%; mean over the four task types of the item-score means within the D4 countermeasures sub-domain (62 items); 380 expert-written items on cryptographic engineering security for IoT devices; zero-shot, temperature 0, no tools, provider default reasoning mode; judgment and scenario answers scored by a Qwen3.5-397B judge from outside the evaluated set). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 11 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K2.685.5#173
2GLM-5.285.3#137
3Gemini 3.7 Flash83.3#32
4GPT-5.6 Luna81.6#117
5DeepSeek V4 Pro79.5#181
6DeepSeek V373.2#705
7MiniMax-M2.567.4#590
8GLM-4 32B (0414)57.9#1407
9Llama 4 Maverick56.9#1105
10Ling-flash-2.053.8#1352
11Hunyuan A13B-Instruct52.5#2021

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cesbench-countermeasures · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.