Cedar - Multimodal - Chinese: leaderboard
Culturally grounded emotion understanding on Cedar's 400 Chinese image-plus-narrative scenarios: choose which of 14 emotions Chinese-speaking annotators assign, a label chosen because it differs across cultures for the same scene. Accuracy (%) at temperature 0, higher is better (Cedar, Dai et al., Hefei University of Technology, ACL 2026).
Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around May 2028. 14 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 36.71 | #244 |
| 2 | Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking) | 35.88 | #451 |
| 3 | Gemma 3 27B (IT) | 30 | #1306 |
| 4 | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Thinking) | 29.32 | #452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash) |
| 5 | Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking) | 27.66 | #887 |
| 6 | Mistral Small 3.2 | 26.92 | #1592 |
| 7 | GPT-4o (2024-11-20) | 26.01 | #864 |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cedar-multimodal-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.