CDH-Bench (Multiple-Choice QA): leaderboard

Metric: Counterfactual accuracy (%) on the 300 counterfactual images (100 each of counting, relational and attribute anomalies, generated and human-verified so the commonsense-violating fact is unambiguous and central), choosing among four shuffled options: the answer the image shows, the commonsense alternative as an explicit distractor and two other plausible distractors; each image is shown alone, without its matched commonsense twin, under one prompt per format; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)81.67#54
2Qwen 3.5 Plus74.37#123
3Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Preview)71.67#186
4Kimi K2.564.67#139
5Doubao-Seed-1-8-25122864.67#146
6Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)60.46#287 (Qwen 3 VL 32B)
7GPT-5.458.86#76
8GPT-5.4 Mini53.33#202
9Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)50
10Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)47.33#471 (Qwen 3 VL 4B)
11Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct46#276
12Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct42#401
13Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct34.33#506

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cdh-bench-multiple-choice-qa · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.