CDH-Bench (Binary QA) - Counting Anomalies: leaderboard

Metric: Counterfactual accuracy (%) on the 100 counting-anomaly images (atypical counts such as a six-fingered hand or a six-winged chicken), answering a yes/no question that asserts the commonsense reading and denies the depicted anomaly (for example 'Does the mouth have 2 rows of teeth and not 3 rows?'), so the correct answer on every counterfactual image is no; each image is shown alone, without its matched commonsense twin, under one prompt per format; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)96#54
2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Preview)94#186
3Doubao-Seed-1-8-25122880#146
4Qwen 3.5 Plus77.78#123
5Kimi K2.576#139
6GPT-5.4 Mini65#202
7GPT-5.461#76

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cdh-bench-binary-qa-counting-anomalies · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.