CDH-Bench (Binary QA): leaderboard

Metric: Counterfactual accuracy (%) on the 300 counterfactual images (100 each of counting, relational and attribute anomalies, generated and human-verified so the commonsense-violating fact is unambiguous and central), answering a yes/no question that asserts the commonsense reading and denies the depicted anomaly (for example 'Does the mouth have 2 rows of teeth and not 3 rows?'), so the correct answer on every counterfactual image is no; each image is shown alone, without its matched commonsense twin, under one prompt per format; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)90.33#54
2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Preview)83.67#186
3Doubao-Seed-1-8-25122876.67#146
4Qwen 3.5 Plus75.87#123
5Kimi K2.575.67#139
6GPT-5.4 Mini64#202
7GPT-5.463.67#76
8Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)56.37#287 (Qwen 3 VL 32B)
9Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct55.67#276
10Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)55#471 (Qwen 3 VL 4B)
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)53
12Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct52#506
13Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct45#401

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cdh-bench-binary-qa · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.