Causal-Plan-Bench - Effects: leaderboard

The effects dimension of Causal-Plan-Bench (2026), the mean of three tasks on what an action changes: affordance visual semantics and spatial and functional postconditions, as four-choice accuracy (%). Items come from egocentric and robot video and every model sees the same instruction and evidence; higher is better.

Metric: Effects score: mean four-choice accuracy (%) after answer normalization over the affordance visual semantics, spatial postcondition and affordance postcondition tasks; 100 held-out expert-reviewed items per task drawn from egocentric and robot video (EPIC-KITCHENS, Ego4D, HoloAssist and others), the same instruction, visual evidence and answer format for every model, temperature 0.2, mean of three regenerated runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2033. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6 Astra39.67#6
2Seed 2.1 Pro37.33#135
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)36#94
4GPT-5.6 Sol36#30
5Kimi K2.533.33#256
6Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct33#981
7GPT-4o30.33#741

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=causal-plan-bench-effects · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.