CATTest - Pass/Not-Pass Recall: leaderboard

Coarse-grained pass/not-pass recall when a VLM testing agent judges whether each of 102 AI-generated web applications passes, under the CATJudge framework with a 250-turn budget at provider defaults (CATTest, arXiv 2609.00081v1, Table 1). Percent; higher is better. Recall alone rewards flagging failures liberally; the paper pairs it with precision.

Metric: Recall (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 17 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.698.65#94
2GPT-5.493.67#83
3Claude Opus 4.793.67#51
4Claude Opus 4.689.87#67
5GPT-5.586.08#33
6Gemini 3 Flash83.54#103
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)82.28#64
8Qwen 3.5 27B78.48#192
9Kimi K2.675.95#113
10Qwen 3.6 27B72.15#182
11Qwen 3.5 Plus72.15#133
12GPT-5.4 Mini62.03#228
13GLM-5V Turbo58.23#172
14Seed 2.0 Pro44.3#122
15Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite40.51#200

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=cattest-pass-not-pass-recall · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.