CanItEdit (Lazy): leaderboard

Instructional code editing (CanItEdit, Cassano et al., COLM 2024) with the lazy instruction, a terse user-style request, for each of the 105 hand-written Python problems, checked by a hidden test suite. pass@1 in percent estimated from 20 samples at temperature 0.2; higher is better.

Metric: pass@1 (%; share of the 105 hand-written Python editing problems whose edited code passes the hidden test suite, estimated from 20 samples per problem at temperature 0.2, top-p 0.95; lazy instructions, a terse user-style request). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 25 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-4 (0613)51.95#1214
2GPT-3.5 Turbo (0125)42.71#3519
3CodeLlama-70B-Instruct-hf37.52#6548
4deepseek-coder-6.7B-instruct31.65#7937
5starcoder2-15B31.48#8536
6deepseek-coder-6.7B-base27.76#9230
7starcoder27.62#9634
8Mixtral 8x7B Instruct24.9#4484
9CodeLlama-34B-Instruct-hf24.15#7428
10CodeLlama-7B-Instruct-hf23.49#9444
11deepseek-coder-1.3B-instruct17.27#9590
12CodeLlama-13B-Instruct-hf16.89#9291
13starcoder2-7B13.76#9557
14starcoder2-3B13.33#9854

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=canitedit-lazy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.