Blind-Spots-Bench - Multimodal-to-Text: leaderboard

Questions that combine an image with text and ask for a text answer, targeting perception and reasoning blind spots that people find easy; from Blind-Spots-Bench (EPFL, 2026). Accuracy in percent averaged over four samples; higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; mean@4 over four samples on the questions with image input and text output, vision-language models only; 235 human-authored questions with reference solutions graded correct or incorrect by gemini-3-flash with code execution; no tools; thinking enabled at medium effort where available; max 32,768 output tokens). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Medium)66.9#94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) (Medium)64.5#144 (Gemini 3 Flash (Preview))
3GPT-5.558.7#49
4GPT-5.4 (Medium)58.1#123 (GPT-5.4)
5GPT-5.2 (Medium)50#176 (GPT-5.2)
6Qwen 3.5 122B A10B48.8#331
7Qwen 3.5 397B A17B48.3#246
8Qwen 3.5 35B A3B47.1#482
9GPT-5.4 Mini (Medium)45.3#389 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
10Kimi K2.542.4#256
11Kimi K2.641.9#178
12gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)40.7
13GPT-537.8#167
14Gemini 2.5 Pro36#266
15GPT-5 Mini33.1#348

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=blind-spots-bench-multimodal-to-text · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.