Benchmarking Large Language Models for Graphem: leaderboard

Grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) conversion is essential for controllable and robust text-to-speech, and large language models (LLMs), with broad linguistic knowledge, offer a promising approach. We benchmarked over 30 LLMs on Japanese G2P, comparing them with conventional morphological analyzers on 3000 manually annotated sentences. We evaluated two prompting strategies: a parse mode, where the LLM perf

Metric: Direct (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 37 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)0.53#58
2Claude Opus 4.60.74#63
3GPT-5.21.05#110
4Gemini 2.5 Flash1.17#245
5Claude Sonnet 4.61.28#90
6Gemini 3 Flash1.61#99
7GPT-OSS-120B3.45#341
8Kimi K2.54.91#144
9GLM-54.96#141
10GLM-4.75.87#192
11Qwen 3.5 397B A17B6.2#146
12Qwen 3.5 27B14.61#187
13GPT-OSS-20B14.71#518
14Gemma 3 27B15.16#607
15Qwen 3.5 122B A10B16.8#173

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=benchmarking-large-language-models-for-graphem · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.